Skip to main content

Oh, the Places You'll Go

 "...accurate maps don't come cheap. In fact, it's often more profitable to steal an accurate map than try to buy one on the open market, or so many sea captains claim." 
- Chris Perkins, Iomandra Wiki Page

I spent part of yesterday browsing through the wiki page for Iomandra, Chris Perkins' home campaign.  In it, he has posted various maps of his world and some of their cities.  I was quite amazed, needless to say, as mapping my campaign world is something I've been trying to do for a while now (or at least finding a way to map Genkar, the city the heroic tier characters have been involved with).

For quick reference, here is the link to all of Chris' maps:

I looked at the map of Io'galaroth and was amazing by the detail Chris put into his map.  I was determined to start making some maps of my own, and started brainstorming how I was going to do this.  I figured Genkar would be the best place to start, as the PC's have spent significant campaign time there (the entire heroic tier has pretty much revolved around the city), so I pulled out my notes of the city and wanted to start getting to work.

Scaling is always an issue.  Chris states on his Io'galaroth map that 1 square on the grid is equal to 200 feet.  This means that 40 squares of a dungeon tile equals 1 square on his map.  I spent some time trying to do the math and figure out how big certain locations need to be, and to be honest, such a thing froze me in my tracks.  Putting numbers to these locations of my campaign world became extremely scary and made me feel like I had to start designing every little location.

For example, at one area of Genkar we have the Tower of the Protector, a tall tower surrounded by a lake.  Underneath the tower is the Tomb of Genkar, the gold dragon founder of the city.  When I drew it, it was a 2x2 circle.  That gives it a 200 foot radius.  If I have adventures there, do I really need to make sure an entire area of the tower goes for about 40 squares?  These are the questions I've been having, especially since I plan on mapping a section of the Tower in the next session.

Re-reading that paragraph, I'm telling myself I'm over-reacting.  I think scale is just something used to convey a sense of grandeur for cities and certain areas.  Chris doesn't put scales on all his maps (especially his world map), yet I still feel a sense of depth and wonder when I look at them.

I grabbed my copies of The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit to double check the maps there.  I was 95% sure that LOTR had scales with the maps, but I wasn't sure about Hobbit.  Hobbit does not have a scale.  The distances are just drawn in.  Does this take away from the map?  Once again, I have to say no.

Game of Thrones don't have scaled maps either.

I'm now starting to see a pattern as I go through all these books again.  Map scale really doesn't matter.  With Thrones, the biggest city and the small cities are all conveyed by a dot, so they effectively are the same size.  This is probably something handy to apply to DnD too.  Scale doesn't really matter; it's all about creating what you want.  If everybody knows that the Tower of the Protector is a huge building, I don't have to show every single little detail.  I can show it to them in chunks and develop what needs to be developed slowly.

Squares and distances in dungeons function the same.  These things take up however much space they need to in order to tell a great story.  Maybe they snake underground.  Maybe they're magically made to look smaller than they really are.  There are a plethora of reasons for why things are the way they are, and most players probably won't bother asking about scale.  For us world builders though, such things seem to be extremely important.

Ultimately, I think I will simply continue mapping Genkar without worrying too much about scale.  When it comes to world maps, I think I can convey basic ideas like "X is closer to Y than Z".  Unless you want to play a super hard core game, distance is relative.  It's not the destination, it's the journey.

As always, please leave comments and let me know what you think.  Be sure to follow me on Twitter @artificeralf.


Popular posts from this blog

D&DNext and the Despair Deck

"Fear attracts the fearful." - Darth Maul
In May of 2011 (which seems like forever ago), Wizards of the Coast released a 4th Edition supplement entitled The Shadowfell: Gloomwrought and Beyond.  One of the coolest things to come in the box set was a deck of 30 cards called the Despair Deck.  The deck, to quote from the campaign guide, "represents the unnatural behaviors and neuroses that can come over those who visit the Shadowfell."  I would like to that statement one step farther and say that the deck represents behaviors and neuroses that come over those who visit any place of horror.  Flipping through the deck, the cards are separated into three main categories: Fear, Apathy, and Madness.  Such traits create good roleplaying opportunities, as well as further demonstrating the horrors that adventurers face on a regular basis.

I thought the Despair Deck was a great addition to special encounters and events for D&D, and I've really wanted to c…

Revisiting the Trinket Lord

As I’ve gone back to dive into the options that are 4e D&D, I took another hard look at something near and dear to my heart: my 4e published article, The Trinket Lord. Published in Dungeon 205 (August 2012), it was another article in the Court of Stars series about the Archfey. With GenCon 2017 occurring right now, I figured it's a good time to talk about such things again.  I had always found the Court of Stars articles extremely intriguing and full of adventure hooks, but when I pitched this article, only two existed, The Prince of Frost (Dragon 374) and the Bramble Queen (Dungeon 185).
The Trinket Lord was originally pitched back in April 2012, when WotC accepted article submissions for their Dragon and Dungeon magazines. My contact for the entire process was Greg Bilsland (which was a major “whoa!” moment for me). I consider my relatively short interactions with Greg to have been extremely insightful, as he gave me a good mix of compliments and critiques and helped me im…

The Evils of Fey

"They were big and little creatures. Some were hairy with long, thin tails, and some had noses long as pokers. Some had bulging eyes and some had 20 toes. In they came -- crashing through the door, sliding down the chimney, crawling through the windows. They shouted and cried. They banged pots and pans. They twirled their tails and tapped their toes upon the wooden floor. He watched as the trolls gobbled the food and threw the plates and drank everything in sight. They continued to shout and scream, to scratch the walls and pound the floors and slap their tails upon the table. The tiny trolls were the worst of all. They screamed at the top of their lungs and pulled each others' tails." - The Brothers Grimm
In the previous post, I wrote about broadening the use of monsters in my campaigns.  I mentioned my love for the fey and the Feywild, and how I was trying to step away from it.  In today's post, I want to embrace the fey, and write about all of the wild i…